|
HP R742 Photosmart Digital Camera (Black)
Sale: $224.00
Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days |
Product Description
An easy-on-the-eyes display (2.5"), 7 megapixel resolution, and 21x total zoom are just a few of the reasons you'll like Photosmart R742. It has all the usual cool HP camera features, including the ability to get rid of red eye and Design Gallery for dressing up your shots. And this sleek model is super compact and easy to stash in a purse or backpack.
| Takes 7-megapixel photos for stunning prints |
| HP Precision Lens with 3x optical zoom; 7x digital zoom |
| 2.5-inch color LCD display |
| Selectable shooting modes |
| 16 MB of built-in memory; SD and SDHC card slot |
|
Accessories
|
Customers Reviews
2008-09-07
Really bad camera
My daughter has had two of these cameras. Both broke within two months. HP replaced both but since camera is now discontinued, I am not surprised it has been phased out. Go elsewhere for a point and shoot.
| 
2008-07-28
Best Choice for Me
I have always wanted a digital camera, and after much research found the HP R742 Photosmart to be the best deal for the money and product. I originally wanted the Ruby Red, but I had Amazon bucks, and it wasn't available on Amazon yet. Turns out, color was not such a big deal, and the black one was a great choice. It is easy to use, and will not take the pic if you are out of focus or moving too much. The ease of downloading the images to my laptop is great and all of the camera functions are easy to use. I'm not a pro photographer, but I just can't take a bad picture thanks to HP R742.
|
2008-07-07
HP R742 Photosmart Digital Camera (Black)
This is my families third HP R742 digital camera. It is very easy to use. It has a rechargeable battery with charger. This 7 mega-pixel camera takes excellent pictures. It comes in different colors witch is great because everyone in my family had a different color camera.
| 
2008-07-06
Poor product service from HP
This is an excellent camera and I've been delighted, but guess what? It's now no longer available and neither is a replacement charger for the battery. My charger got misplaced when we moved, and I thought, no problem I'll just go to the HP site and reorder. The charger is not available; no picture of it anywhere, no suggestion of an alternate item to buy. The online help referred me to the HP Parts store page, no mention of it there either. My opinion of HP has changed...they do not stand by their products.
| 
2008-07-06
Nice Pocket Camera, Lost over my old HP727
I purchased the R742 about two months ago, the red version. The color is very nice (it's not a magenta red like the pictures may show). The camera color doesn't matter that much though, so let's get to the real issues. Photo quality is quite good, I have no problems with graininess, lines, color issues, etc. As far as this is concerned, it is exactly what I would expect from a camera in this price bracket ($0-$250). Sure, you can't do as much with it as you could with a higher end camera or a SLR, but then again, look at the price you're paying.
Pros:
1) It is nice and small, very easy to slide into a pocket or purse to have on hand.
2) While 3x zoom (the other 7x is digital and not worth anything) is not much, it works for being a small camera and seems pretty standard.
3) The price is inexpensive, yet is a nice low-end camera.
4) The click-to-snap time is less than a second I find (i.e. the time between when I press the button, it figures out the exact focus, sets off flash, and "snaps" the shot) which is better than my prior camera which seemed to delay things longer.
5) The 7 MP is plenty for nice shots even if I want to enlarge to greater than 8 x 10.
Things I don't like, but you may, and things I find different between the R742 and my older R727:
1) The R742 power button is a bit hard to press the way it is buried. I have a medium hand size with dexterous fingers, but even I have to press it twice sometimes. The good thing about this though is you don't accidentally turn it on when it's in your pocket! However, my old R727 I sometimes turn on by accident.
2) The R742 button to switch between taking and viewing photos is a "slide" button. It seems a bit flimsy, and although I have not had a problem with it I much prefer my older HP727 that had the buttons for this on the top that you press as it is easier to toggle between the two while taking photos.
3) The lens moves out when turned on - now this is normal for a lot of cameras, but coming off of my HP727 that did not have an external lens (yet still had 3x optical, 7x digital zoom!), this has taken getting used too.
4) On my old HP727, the buttons for setting focus and flash are right on the camera, but now I have to scroll through two menus to get to this; which is annoying when I want to pull this new HP742 out for a quick shot. Now, instead of less than 2 seconds to select focus range and flash setting, it takes about 10. This is a huge difference, for example, if I see some birds, or deer, etc that I want a picture of before they fly/run off.
Summary:
Over the course of more than two years, I would think that there should be improvements on the R742 from the older versions of pretty much the same model (i.e. my old R727). In reality, the easy usability backslid in those 2+ years, and features (The 1 MP better and faster click-to-snap time) made only tiny strides. If my menu/"ok" button on the R727 constantly worked I would have returned this R742 immediately, as the above two mentioned strides do not make up for the usability issues I have with it.
I just went on HP's site, and did not find this camera nor very many others listed. I wonder if they are not going to make cameras any longer. I really like HP products; my desktop (HP D4100E from 2005 and still going strong, no problems at all), laptop (newly purchased TX2000z), printer/scanner/fax (C7280), and camera are all HP. However, this most recent purchase has me wishing I went with a Cannon, or had just waited until I have enough money for a Nikon SLR. I think HP has lost the market on their cameras, and based on their website, they know it.
| |
|
Product Details
Batteries Included: 1
Binding: Electronics
Brand: Hewlett-Packard
Color: Black
EAN: 0883585327362
Floppy Disk Drive Description: None
Has Red Eye Reduction: 1
Is Autographed:
Is Memorabilia:
Label: Hewlett Packard
Legal Disclaimer:
Manufacturer: Hewlett Packard
Model: R742
Publisher: Hewlett Packard
Release Date:
Special Features:
Studio: Hewlett Packard
System Memory Size: |
HP Photosmart digital camera: R967 The HP has introduced the HP Photosmart R967, a digital camera featuring a huge 3-inch LCD screen with a 170-degree viewing angle and 10 megapixel resolution. The new version incorporates the HP Precision 3x optical lens,10x digital zoom that makes 30x total zoom. It offers 17 shooting modes plus macro multi-zone auto focus and HP steady photo anti-shake mode. It also incorporates in-camera red-eye removal, HP Design Gallery and other HP Real Life technologies for high-quality shots in various conditions. The Movie Mode captures VGA video with audio shoots at 24 frames per second. It comes in a durable compact body with an on-camera button which enables to easy share your images.
Shop for the HP digital cameras at our online store.
Read the full review of the HP Photosmart R967.
HP Photosmart R967, digital camera review, digital photography, HP digital cameras, digital cameras
|
NewsHAMILTON — With a freeze on capital spending, city officials are looking to outside groups for funding what's considered standard equipment in today's law enforcement. Hamilton City Manager Mark Brandenburger has sent letters to the Molyneaux ... Read more
The Norristown landlord who allegedly concealed cameras throughout his tenants' apartments for two decades hid something else today: himself. Thomas C. Daley hiked his light-blue denim shirt up over his face as he navigated a phalanx of photographers ... Read more
The chief legislative aide to Philadelphia City Councilman W. Wilson Goode Jr. issued a "letter of apology" yesterday for flashing handwritten signs in City Council chambers comparing a Fox29 news reporter to the Ku Klux Klan. In the letter addressed ... Read more
|
 |
|
|
;){kind=link}