| Author |
Message
|
| logan14k0 |
 Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2007 9:42 am Post subject: Need photo enhancement software |
 |
|
Fan
Joined: 12 Jul 2007
Posts: 9
|
Hi all,
I have a color lab and I am already using some software for photo editing but I am suffering so many problems so I decided to purchase latest software that fulfills my all requirements. Actually I want great enhancement and optimization for digital images.
Advice will be appreciated.
Thanks |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|
sugie |
| Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2007 6:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Addict
Joined: 30 May 2006
Posts: 105
|
| I think there is nothing better than Photoshop when it goes to photo editing. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| cameron_gkn |
| Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2007 5:12 am Post subject: Re:Need photo enhancement software |
|
|
Fan
Joined: 13 Jul 2007
Posts: 4
|
Hi,
I am currently using a software Imagic Photo in my lab; you can use it for all purpose likes personal, magazines, Photography, Modeling and everything! It’s very easy to download you just go imagic-photo dot com/download and get amazing effects in your digital photos. You can see effect with one push of a button, your pictures come out exactly the way you want them to.. no experience needed! Imagic Photo makes any picture look better. Any picture, every time!
Good Luck!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Stoffel |
| Posted: Sun Jul 15, 2007 9:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
Fan
Joined: 14 Jul 2007
Posts: 2
Location: Bothaville, South Africa
|
Hi, if you want free editing software picaso from google is also good.
_________________
Have fun! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| NMOphoto |
| Posted: Sat May 30, 2009 2:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Fan
Joined: 30 May 2009
Posts: 3
Location: Oakfield, NY
|
Photoshop is awesome. I also Use photoshop lightroom2. That has less options in terms of graphic art but it allows you to edit the photo and correct things with ease. Little different to use at first but once you get a hold of it, Its so fast and easy.
_________________
Just remember, Where ever you are...There ya go. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Lynxy |
| Posted: Sun May 31, 2009 12:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
Aficionado
Joined: 29 Jan 2009
Posts: 84
Location: Poland
|
Lightroom is cool but I prefer Camera Raw (goes with Photoshop), it's more handy for me, I like the design and Clarity function (so unusual soft blur or hard sharp effect).
Do somebody use Neat Image for noise reduction? I've got the soft but can't really understand how to achieve the best results.
_________________
my photos are O.K. to edit |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| ratbert |
| Posted: Mon Jun 01, 2009 7:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Enthusiast
Joined: 10 Oct 2008
Posts: 20
|
I use noise ninja for noise reduction. very happy with it.
If you are not tied to photoshop plugins, I would suggest The GIMP. It's open source freeware that has much of the same functionality as photoshop (very comprehensive). I don't use it myself because I have photoshop plugins, which don't work with it. But it's free, so it's worth a try.
_________________
http://www.flickr.com/photos/memento/
http://64vwresto.bravehost.com/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Chris L |
| Posted: Sun Jun 07, 2009 3:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Devotee
Joined: 22 Jan 2008
Posts: 40
|
| Photoshop, but it is rather expensive. As an alternative you can use Elements, its good and is less expensive. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| logan14k0 |
| Posted: Sat Sep 12, 2009 1:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Fan
Joined: 12 Jul 2007
Posts: 9
|
You've been watching too much CSI.
The amount of detail which can be viewed by zooming in depends on the resolution of the camera taking the picture and the resolution of the saved image on the computer.
The resolution is determined by the number of pixels per inch.
A program can only display and work with the resolution present in the photo. When zooming in the pixels are enlarged, they are not added to.
A photo measuring 200 x 200 pixels when zoomed in on would still be 200 x 200 but larger pixels.
If the detail is not present there is nothing for a program to enhance.
Ever wonder why those pics of wanted criminals on TV from CCTV security cameras are often blurred and fuzzy? They're supplied by real forensic officers. It would be easier to identify the crims if the pics were sharp and clear but it can't be done.
Unless of course you're Gil Grissom......
_________________
TeraDepot.Com - Best Free Online Image Sharing Service. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Lynxy |
| Posted: Sun Sep 13, 2009 10:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Aficionado
Joined: 29 Jan 2009
Posts: 84
Location: Poland
|
I agree with the problem of small resolution of digital cameras. But the progress goes ahead :)) though such cameras are rather expensive.
But I wanted to say.. when CSI enlarges the image it doubles the nearby pixels. but the program doesn't know the exact tone of each new pixel, so the image looses its sharpness and details. I mean pixels don't become larger they are simply doubled.
_________________
my photos are O.K. to edit |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
Live Chat
